By Pelin Ayan Musil (auth.)
Read Online or Download Authoritarian Party Structures and Democratic Political Setting in Turkey PDF
Best turkey books
In 1908, the revolution of the younger Turks deposed the dictatorship of Sultan Abdulhamid II and tested a constitutional regime that grew to become the main ruling energy within the Ottoman empire. however the seeds of this revolution went again a lot farther: to 1889, while the key younger Turk association the Committee of Union and growth used to be shaped.
This ebook offers the Turkish place concerning the Armenian claims of genocide in the course of global conflict I and the ongoing debate over this issue. The writer illustrates that even supposing genocide is an invaluable notion to explain such evil occasions because the Jewish Holocaust in global warfare II and Rwanda within the Nineteen Nineties, the time period has additionally been overused, misused, and consequently trivialized by way of many various teams looking to demonize their antagonists and win sympathetic approbation for them.
Why did the most problem to the Ottoman nation come now not in peasant or elite rebellions, yet in endemic banditry? Karen Barkey exhibits how Turkish options of incorporating peasants and rotating elites saved either teams depending on the kingdom, not able and unwilling to insurgent. Bandits, previously mercenary squaddies, weren't attracted to uprising yet focused on attempting to achieve nation assets, extra as rogue consumers than as primitive rebels.
- The Towers of Trebizond
- Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey
- Turn Right at Istanbul: A Walk on the Gallipoli Peninsula
- The Dervish House
- Guarding the Frontier: Ottoman Border Forts and Garrisons in Europe (Library of Ottoman Studies)
- Turquoise: A Chef's Travels in Turkey
Extra resources for Authoritarian Party Structures and Democratic Political Setting in Turkey
There were two major reasons for this change: an important exogenous shock on the Turkish political system—the military memorandum in 1971—as well as the nature of the allocation of power sources within the party organization. 13 Yet they were easily eliminated from the party; due to the authoritarian leadership style of İnönü. 14 The faction supporting the secretary general Ecevit’s position against the newly established government, soon gained power against Inönü’s faction and led to this leadership change.
54 Therefore, they create a new typology of parties inclusive of the cases drawn from third-wave democracies. The main distinction within this typology is based on the “organizationally thick” and “organizationally thin” parties. They argue that the origin of the “organizationally thin” parties that show a great deal of authoritarian features and low degree of party membership was the contingent effect of an illiterate, rural, and “politically unmobilized” segment of the society. 55 Rustow, comparing the Middle Eastern parties with the European cases, stresses a common ground on what was experienced in all subregions of Europe: all in all, it was a struggle between the representative assemblies and the royal power, and the former was what was missing in the Middle East region’s path to democracy: Representation came to be considered a general civic right rather than a corporate class privilege [in Europe], and the partisan contest spilled over EXISTING EXPLANATIONS 23 from the chambers of the legislature to the public at large.
One can exercise power over others only by satisfying their needs and expectations; one thereby paradoxically submits oneself to their power. 82 Despite Panebianco’s analysis, it is surprising to see that power is treated as something owned by the party elite in authoritarian party structures. There is a need to treat it as a relational phenomenon and pay attention to the internal governance processes between the party leaders and the local activists. 1 Turkey is one of the countries where political leaders have played a paramount influence in shaping the societal, political, and economic evolution of a country in its path to democracy.