By Wim Van Oorschot, Michael Opielka, Birgit Pfau-Effinger
"Culture and Welfare kingdom" offers comparative experiences within the interaction among cultural components and welfare regulations. beginning with an research of the historic and cultural foundations of Western-European welfare states, mirrored within the competing ideologies of liberalism, conservatism and socialism, the publication is going directly to evaluate the Western-European welfare version to these in North-America, Asia and crucial and japanese Europe. complete and fascinating, this quantity examines not just the relationships among cultural switch and welfare restructuring, taking empirical facts from coverage reforms in modern Europe, but additionally the preferred legitimacy of welfare, focusing fairly at the underlying values, ideals and attitudes of individuals in ecu nations.
Read or Download Culture And Welfare State: Values and Social Policy in Comparative Perspective PDF
Similar social services & welfare books
This quantity offers a community of social energy, indicating that theories encouraged by way of C. Wright turbines are way more exact perspectives approximately strength in the United States than these of Mills's rivals. Dr. Domhoff indicates how and why coalitions in the energy elite have concerned themselves in such coverage matters because the Social safety Act (1935) and the Employment Act (1946), and the way the nationwide hard work kin Act (1935) might cross opposed to the competition of each significant company.
With unparalleled breadth, significant Thinkers in Welfare examines a number of perspectives and theories on a number of welfare issues—including wealth, poverty, inequality, slavery, gender, relations, schooling, crime, and the function of governments and markets in society—from historical Greece to the top of the 19th century.
An elevated wisdom of the significance of minority and subjugated voices to the histories and narratives that have formerly excluded them has ended in a generic curiosity within the results of colonization and displacement. This selection of essays is the 1st to use post-colonial thought to the center a while, and to critique that thought in the course of the excavation of prior.
- An Intellectual History of British Social Policy: Idealism Versus Non-idealism
- A handbook of comparative social policy
- The Philosophy of Risk
- Palestinian NGOs in Israel: The Politics of Civil Society (Library of Modern Middle East Studies)
- Children & young people's workforce
Extra resources for Culture And Welfare State: Values and Social Policy in Comparative Perspective
Furthermore, dimensions of stratiﬁcation interact with the result that individuals in particular categories are highly disadvantaged in terms of the exercise of citizenship rights, particularly social citizenship rights. 13 These contradictions are associated with citizenship in all liberal democratic capitalist societies not just in those societies we characterize as ‘liberal’. 14 The twin pillars of these societies are a capitalist economic system and a democratic political system. This duality means that economic and political power constrain one another.
3–28. ’, in Franz-Xaver Kaufmann, Anton Kuijsten, Hans-Joachim Schulze and Klaus-Peter Strohmeier (eds), Family Life and Family Policies in Europe, vol. 2: Problems and Issues in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 321–62. Swank, Duane and Hans-Georg Betz (2003), ‘Globalization, the welfare state, and right wing populism in Western Europe’, Socio-Economic Review, 1 (2), 215–45. Swidler, Ann (1986), ‘Culture in action: symbols and strategies’, American Sociological Review, 51 (2), 273–86.
1999: 51). In summary, social liberalism is characterized by a reluctant collectivism to use the terminology of George and Wilding (1985), that is, it accepted the need for state intervention to compensate for the negative consequences of the unregulated market economy, but it adhered to the individualism and primacy of private enterprise that characterized classical liberalism and while it argued for a lessening of the consequences of inequality it favoured inequality on economic incentive grounds.